We review every evaluation form and try to apply the constructive comments to the following CMG conference.
1. Which category best describes your primary employment role?
2. What time of the year would best enable you attend future CMG conferences? Please rank the following options on a scale of 1 to 4, where 1 is LEAST favorable and 4 is MOST favorable.
3. How did you learn about CMG 2003?
4. Were you a CMG member prior to the conference?
5. Which of the following CMG conferences did you attend?
6. Are you a member of a regional group?
7. Are your current job responsibilities more supervisory or more technically oriented?
8. On what platforms do you spend most of your time? (by percent of time):
9. Which platform did you come to learn more about?
14. We featured 7 tracks per session timeslot this year. Do you think this is:
15. Should we schedule reruns of sessions?
16. What subject area would you like to see as a CMG Showcase or focus?
17. Do you do Capacity Planning/Performance Evaluation
18. What percent of your time do you also spend doing:
19. Would you rather see Preliminary Agenda as:
20. Did you know about CMG’s Online Conference Scheduler on the website?
21. If you used the Scheduler, how effective did you find it (scale of 1-10, where 10 is best)
22. Tell us what we did right:
23. Tell us what we did wrong:
24. Tell us what we can we do to improve:
25. Tell us what presentations you would like to see:
Thank you for completing this form. We appreciate the feedback. Your comments and opinions are very important to us and each submission will be reviewed.
Home | Conference | Groups | National | Members | Links | Site Map